Oxbridge Notes uses cookies for login, tax evidence, digital piracy prevention, business intelligence, and advertising purposes, as explained in our privacy policy.

Technical settings

Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

Harrods v Harrodian School

[1996] RPC 697

Case summary last updated at 02/02/2020 21:38 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Harrods v Harrodian School

Facts from above. In relation to the suggestion that use of term ‘Harrodian’ had diluted the goodwill in C’s name, held:
 
Sir Michael Kerr (dissenting)
·        A trader’s distinctive name can in some casesitself form part of his goodwill.
Ø  And therefore constitute a property interest.

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Intellectual Property Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious academic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Intellectual Property Law Notes

Intellectual Property Law Notes >>