Oxbridge Notes uses cookies for login, tax evidence, digital piracy prevention, business intelligence, and advertising purposes, as explained in our privacy policy.

Technical settings

Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

R v SoS for Employment, ex p Seymour-Smith & Perez

[2000] IRLR 263

Case summary last updated at 17/02/2020 17:06 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case R v SoS for Employment, ex p Seymour-Smith & Perez

(HL)Using the test set out by the ECJ, the HL, by a majority, decided that the discrimination was justifiable. 
 
Lord Nicholls: The test from the ECJ for objective justification is a broad one, reflecting the need for the government to be able to govern without having unrealistic burdens imposed on it. 
 
Lord Slynn (dissenting): There was no indirect discrimination, looking at the actual figures. 

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Labour Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious adademic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Labour Law Notes

Labour Law Notes >>