A-Level Notes > Heathfield School A-Level Notes > A2 King Lear Notes

Critical History And Contemporary Critics Notes

This is a sample of our (approximately) 3 page long Critical History And Contemporary Critics notes, which we sell as part of the A2 King Lear Notes collection, a A package written at Heathfield School in 2015 that contains (approximately) 72 pages of notes across 12 different documents.

Learn more about our A2 King Lear Notes

The original file is a 'Word (Docx)' whilst this sample is a 'PDF' representation of said file. This means that the formatting here may have errors. The original document you'll receive on purchase should have more polished formatting.

Critical History And Contemporary Critics Revision

The following is a plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our A2 King Lear Notes. This text version has had its formatting removed so pay attention to its contents alone rather than its presentation. The version you download will have its original formatting intact and so will be much prettier to look at.

Critical History/Cotemporary Critics

08/10/2014

17th Century Criticism
-Performed at court for James I, however was not as successful as Hamlet or Macbeth
-After the restoration it was re-written by Nahum Tate in 1681, who felt the structure was disorganised and the ending was too gloomy 18th Century
-Joseph Wharton (1753) objected to Gloucester's subplot as distracting and his blinding too horrific to be done on stage and Goneril and Regan's savagery was too diabolical
-Samuel Johnson (1768) was angered by the plays lack of justice and found Cordelia's death deeply shocking but did find the sisters a 'just representation of the common events of human life'
-Charles Lamb (1811) believed the plays harshness was unactable
-August Wihelm Schlegel (1808) believed the play showed how 'the science of compassion is exhausted' and humans are prey to 'naked helplessness'
-William Hazlitt (1817) noted how the unnatural came to dominate and there was a sense of 'giddy anarchy' but also believed Shakespeare showed faith in devotion, 'firm faith in filial piety'
-Swinburne (1880) notes the dark fatalism, 'words without meaning'
-George Brandes (1895) saw Cordelia as the 'living emblem of womanly dignity' and the play showed the 'titanic tragedy of human life' and the true sense of the plays despair Conflicting Views on King Lear began to emerge
-A.C Bradley's Shakespearean Tragedy (1905) believed that a Shakespearean tragedy is the tragedy of an individual who suffers as he comes to terms with his personality
-Saw the carless inconsistencies in King Lear and unwieldy subplot
-Viewed Lear as a great superior figure who's suffering is heartwrenching

****************************End Of Sample*****************************

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our A2 King Lear Notes.