Consumption And Random Walk Hypothesis Notes
This is a sample of our (approximately) 3 page long Consumption And Random Walk Hypothesis notes, which we sell as part of the Macroeconomics Notes collection, a 1st Class package written at University Of Cambridge in 2010 that contains (approximately) 16 pages of notes across 6 different documents.
The original file is a 'Word (Doc)' whilst this sample is a 'PDF' representation of said file. This means that the formatting here may have errors. The original document you'll receive on purchase should have more polished formatting.
Consumption And Random Walk Hypothesis Revision
The following is a plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Macroeconomics Notes. This text version has had its formatting removed so pay attention to its contents alone rather than its presentation. The version you download will have its original formatting intact and so will be much prettier to look at.
Macroeconomics, Paper 2, Part IIA Essay "Changes in consumption should be unpredictable. Discuss with reference to the
The theory that changes in consumption are unpredictable is based on the work of the
American economist Robert Hall. The theory is based on the Friedman's permanent income
hypothesis and the theory of rational expectations. According to Friedman's permanent
income hypothesis, consumption depends primarily on permanent income. At any moment in
their lifetime, consumers choose consumption based on their current expectations about
lifetime incomes. They would then change their consumption when they receive news that
causes them to change their expectations about their lifetime income. For example, a person
getting an unexpected promotion would revise his expectations about lifetime income
upwards and thus consume more. As long as consumers use all the available information to
assess their lifetime income, that is as long as they have rational expectations, then they
should only be surprised by events that were entirely unpredictable. Therefore, changes in
their consumption should be unpredictable as well.1 Hall (1978) tests this theory using
postwar aggregate US data and finds that past consumption data have no power in
predicting future consumption as he was unable to reject the hypothesis that lagged values
of either income or consumption can not predict the change in consumption. However,
lagged levels of the S&P stock market index help to predict future consumption.2 Hall's theory is based on several assumptions that he uses in testing the stochastic version
of lifecycle and permanent income hypotheses and which can be challenged. Firstly, there is
the simplifying assumption of a quadratic utility function, which implies that marginal utility is
linear in consumption. As a consequence, the individual consumption decision exhibits
certainty equivalence, which means that individuals ignore the variation of consumption and
act as if future consumption was as its conditional mean. Secondly, Hall further assumes that
consumer want to hold marginal utility and thus consumption constant over time.3 The
problem with the first assumption is that it is problematic to make predictions about individual
or aggregate utility functions. The second assumption may not be realistic since individuals
may on the one hand be aware of the fact that they can afford more consumption in their
working years than when they are still in education or retired and thus adjust their willingness
to smooth consumption. On the other hand, the Pull of Instant Gratification can assign a
higher marginal utility to consumption in the present than in the future, so individuals value
current consumption more than in future, which runs against assumption number two.
Thirdly, the assumption of rational expectations may also not hold for all individuals. When
Mankiw (2006): p532-4 Doppelhofer (2004): p15 3 Doppelhofer (2004): p14-15 2
****************************End Of Sample*****************************
Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Macroeconomics Notes.