This is an extract of our Challenges To The Human Rights Act document, which we sell as part of our GDL Public Law Notes collection written by the top tier of Cambridge/Bpp/College Of Law students.
The following is a more accessble plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our GDL Public Law Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:
Challenges to the Human Rights Act _______________________________________________________
Touchy topics The government (especially under May) is loathed to surrender national powers over the following:
?????Prisoner voting rights The balancing act that is happening is between liberty and national security - the 'unhappy' fact of fundamental freedoms is that everyone is entitled to them, even the most evil man on earth. This seems to baffle a great number of politicians who believe in a more quid pro quo social model - rights in return for allegiance & submission to the laws. Maybe we should return to kissing the ring of the King in exchange for a plot of land eh?
This boils down to a shoot-out between parliamentary sovereignty and the thick rule of law which restrains the government from doing certain things. However the issue with the thick rule of law, of course, is that it must be administered on a practical level by the courts. It is a justifiable criticism that judges should not be law-makers as this unsettles the separation of powers. It is, of course, also a democratic issue. The debate centres around a movement away from political constitutionalism (determined by an elected dictatorship executive) -> legal constitutionalism (administered by the judiciary). 2012 Commission on a Bill of Rights Arguments in favour of a UK Bill of Rights: a) The Human Rights Act is inadequate. a. the Human Rights Act is perceived negatively (regardless of whether this perception is informed/ justified or illinformed/unjustified); b. the current system under the Human Rights Act has resulted in unpopular judicial and related decisions; and c. a UK Bill of Rights would be more effective than the Human Rights Act in protecting the rights of individuals. b) A UK Bill of Rights would be more 'British' and less 'European'. a. a UK Bill of Rights would result in greater domestic 'ownership' of rights; rights would be less 'foreign'; and
Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our GDL Public Law Notes.