International
Relations
notes
1
War
and
Peace
in
the
Nuclear
Age
The
Cold
War
Historical
context
The
Second
World
War
ended
in
1945.
The
winners
of
the
Second
World
War
were
Britain,
France,
the
United
States,
the
Soviet
Union,
China
and
Canada
who
won
against
Japan,
Italy
and
Germany.
Most
European
and
a
lot
of
Asian
states
were
devastated
by
the
war,
their
economical
situation
was
drastic.
The
United
States
on
the
other
hand,
were
experiencing
a
very
prosperous
period.
The
two
superpowers
were
the
United
States
and
the
Soviet
Union.
However,
soon
after
the
end
of
the
Second
World
War,
their
relationship
soon
deteriorated.
This
is
because
of
the
constant
arms
race
and
competition
for
the
non--aligned
world1.
The
United
States
lived
according
to
Capitalism,
which
is
not
exactly
an
ideology,
but
rather
"form
of
social
organization,
based
on
generalized
commodity
production,
in
which
there
is
private
ownership
and/or
control
of
the
means
of
production"
(McLean
and
McMillian
2009,
p.62).
The
Soviet
Union
on
the
other
hand,
was
ruled
by
Communism.
It
is
impossible
to
talk
about
communism
without
mentioning
Karl
Marx.
Marx
is
the
author
of
the
Communist
Manifesto.
In
this
work
he
stated
the
objectives
of
Communism
which
he
thought
to
be
"the
violent
overthrow
of
capitalism
and
the
abolition
of
private
property"
(Dupre
2011,
p.72).
Marx
believed
that
a
revolution
was
necessary
because
"the
dominant
class
under
capitalism
had
used
their
economic
power
to
generate
vast
wealth
for
themselves
[...]
exploiting
the
working
class"
(Dupre
2011,
p.74).
Therefore,
the
compatibility
between
the
Capitalist
(US)
society
and
the
Communist
(USSR)
one
was
almost
impossible.
What
is
the
Cold
War?
The
starting
date
of
the
Cold
War
is
often
debated,
however,
the
official
date
is
considered
to
be
1947.
The
Cold
War
was
a
state
of
mutual
hostility
between
the
two
superpowers
of
that
time:
The
United
States
(US)
and
the
Soviet
Union
(USSR).
The
Cold
War
is
often
called
an
"action
reaction"
conflict,
as
every
action
of
the
US
was
immediately
responded
to
with
a
Soviet
action
and
vice
versa.
The
altered
perception
that
the
superpowers
had
one
of
the
other
is
what
catalysed
the
mutual
paranoia.
The
US
thought
that
the
"USSR
was
dedicated
to
the
conquest
of
Europe
and
the
world
for
itself
and
for
communism"
(Calvocoressi
2009,
p.
3).
The
Soviet
Union
believed
that
"the
western
world
was
inspired
by
capitalist
values
which
demanded
the
destruction
of
the
USSR
and
the
extirpation
of
communism"
(Calvocoressi
2009,
p.
3)
One
of
the
most
peculiar
traits
of
the
Cold
War
is
that
it
was
never
fought
in
a
battlefield,
rather,
it
was
fought
by
secret
agents,
spies
and
secret
investigations.
The
only
active
fighting
was
in
other
places
in
the
world,
geographically
far
from
the
superpowers.
The
Cold
War
period
was
characterised
by
the
constant
fear
of
an
attack
by
the
far
enemy.
This
lead
to
the
arms
race.
The
arms
race
is
in
fact,
one
of
the
most
distinctive
features
of
the
Cold
War.
What
the
term
refers
to
is
the
constant
race
between
the
superpowers
to
have
more
armaments
than
the
enemy,
both
in
terms
of
quantity
and
destruction--capacity.
This
resulted
as
a
rather
expensive
practice,
which
as
many
argue,
lead
to
the
Soviet
Union's
bankruptcy.
What
increased
the
dimension
of
the
conflict
was
the
possession
of
nuclear
arsenals
by
both
superpowers.
A
nuclear
war
would
have
lead
to
the
destruction
of
the
world.
1 The
non--aligned
world:
countries
which
did
not
follow
Capitalist
or
Communist
ideology.
The
Cold
War
is
the
clearest
example
of
a
state
of
brinkmanship--
which
is
the
practice
of
seeking
advantage
in
convincing
that
one
party
is
willing
to
push
towards
a
highly
dangerous
situation
rather
than
concede.
The
Cold
War
can
be
defined
as
an
ideological
conflict
given
that
it
was
the
struggle
between
two
economic
and
social
systems
completely
different
from
each
other.
The
United
States,
embodied
a
Capitalist
ideology,
while
the
Soviet
Union
lived
according
to
a
Communist
one.
Many
scholars
think
it
is
reductive
to
limit
its
definition
to
the
above,
therefore,
they
add
to
it
a
further
dimension
which
is
that
of
a
geopolitical
conflict.
This
definition
is
attributed
to
the
Cold
War
because
of
the
geopolitical
framework
of
the
world
in
that
moment.
Germany
and
Japan
were
defeated
and
occupied
after
the
second
world
war,
England
and
France
were
weakened
by
the
war.
This
resulted
in
the
United
States
and
the
Soviet
Union
emerging
as
the
two
superpowers.
The
origins
of
the
Cold
War:
schools
of
thought
Many
scholars
tried
to
put
a
finger
on
the
causes
of
the
Cold
War.
Before
exploring
the
three
schools
of
thought,
it
is
important
to
state
that
no
school
of
thought
or
summary
can
possibly
encapsulate
all
the
innumerable
shades
and
nuances
of
the
Cold
War.
There
are
three
main
schools
of
thought
which
enclose
the
most
popular
views
on
the
topic,
those
are:
the
Traditionalists
(or
Orthodox),
the
Revisionists
and
the
Post--Revisionists.
The
Traditionalists
The
Traditionalist--
or
Orthodox--
school
of
thought,
was
one
of
the
first
ones
to
emerge.
It
was
extremely
popular
in
the
1950s--60s
(therefore,
at
the
very
beginning
of
the
Cold
War)
and
dominated
by
British
and
American
scholars.
There
are
three
kinds
of
Traditionalists:
conservatives,
liberalists
and
realists,
however,
they
all
agree
on
a
main
point
which
is
that
the
Soviet
Union
is
to
blame
for
the
beginning
of
the
Cold
War.
Traditionalists
attribute
this
to
expansionist
nature
of
the
Soviet
Union
in
Europe.
They
hold
the
view
that
the
person
who
should
be
blamed
the
most
is
Stalin
who
embodied
Soviet
expansionist
ideals
amongst
which
also
triumphed
a
traditional
"great--power"
foreign
policy.
The
Traditionalist
scholars
also
argue
that
Stalin
violated
the
Yalta
agreement2
by
hindering
free
elections
in
Poland
and
surrounding
himself
with
puppet
Communist
regimes.
Moreover,
they
argue
that
the
Soviet
Union
was
an
undeniable
threat
to
Europe.
Conservative
Traditionalists
They
argue
that
the
USSR
was
aggressive
and
imperialist
and
that
Roosevelt
was
too
soft
towards
it.
Moreover,
they
also
thought
that
Communist
China
and
the
Sovietisation
of
Eastern
Europe
were
inevitable--
this
means
that
no
American
action
could
have
prevented
it.
Liberalist
Traditionalists
They
viewed
Roosevelt's
behaviour
as
a
normal
course
of
foreign
policy
and
the
fall
of
China
and
Easter
Europe
into
the
hands
of
Communism
as
inevitable.
Again,
the
United
States,
could
never
have
stopped
the
expansion
of
Communism.
2 Yalta
agreement:
conference
held
in
February
of
1945.
Those
who
took
part
in
the
conference
were
the
three
main
allies:
The
United
Kingdom
(Churchill),
the
United
States
of
America
(Roosevelt)
and
the
Soviet
Union
(Stalin).
Many
agreements
have
been
reached
during
this
meeting,
however,
the
most
important
ones
are:
1.Europe's
freedom
from
Nazism
and
encouraging
ex--Nazi
states
to
have
free
elections,
therefore,
to
embrace
democracy.
International
Relations
notes
3
War
and
Peace
in
the
Nuclear
Age
Realist
Traditionalists
They
do
agree
with
other
Traditionalists
on
the
idea
that
the
Soviet
Union
is
to
blame
for
the
beginning
of
the
Cold
War,
however,
they
also
see
the
United
States
as
largely
responsible.
This
is
due
to
the
fact
that
the
foreign
policy
their
pursued
was
unreasonable
and
based
on
sheer
idealism.
They
also
classify
United
States'
actions
as
crusade
behaviour,
which
according
to
them,
was
not
justifiable
in
that
situation.
The
Revisionists
The
Revisionist
school
of
thought
was
very
popular
in
the
1960s.
It
differs
from
the
Traditionalist
view
in
that
it
blames
both
superpowers,
however,
with
a
special
emphasis
on
the
US,
especially
Roosevelt,
for
the
beginning
of
the
Cold
War.
The
Revisionists
think
that
the
USSR
did
not
pose
a
real
threat
to
the
US
because
the
war
had
left
it
very
economically
weak,
unlike
the
US
which
was
at
its
economic
peak
as
soon
as
the
war
ended.
In
their
view,
Stalin
was
not
an
imperialistic
megalomaniac,
as
the
Traditionalists
pictured
him,
he
was
just
trying
to
rebuild
his
shattered
country.
In
order
to
do
this,
they
think,
he
needed
to
establish
friendly
relationships
with
neighbouring
States.
Roosevelt
is
to
be
blamed
because
he
did
not
take
the
opportunity
to
preserve
a
good
relationship
with
the
Soviet
Union
at
the
end
of
the
Second
World
War.
This
made
it
impossible
for
the
USSR
to
remain
an
ally.
Moreover,
the
Revisionists
see
the
Marshall
Plan
as
pure
Capitalist
exploitation
of
States
which
were
devastated
by
the
war.
They
also
say
that
the
US
offered
the
Marshall
aid
in
order
to
quench
their
thirst
of
expanding
Capitalist
markets.
New
Left
Revisionists
The
New
Left
Revisionists
have
been
strongly
influenced
by
Marxism.
They
state
that
the
Cold
War
was
as
inevitable
outcome
of
American
Capitalist
expansionism.
Post--Revisionists
This
school
of
thought
first
emerged
in
1972.
The
Post--Revisionist
view
differs
entirely
from
the
previous
schools
of
thought,
namely
the
Traditionalists
and
the
Revisionists.
This
is
due
to
the
fact
that
the
blame
for
the
beginning
of
the
Cold
War
is
not
placed
on
the
US
or
the
Soviet
Union,
but
on
the
power
vacuum
created
after
the
Second
World
War
in
Europe.
It
explains
Soviet
and
American
behaviour
as
motivated
by
fear
and
a
desperate
craving
for
security.
This
means
that
everything
that
happened
during
the
Cold
War
period
can
be
explained
in
terms
of
mutual
misunderstanding,
which
lead
to
perceiving
every
action
as
a
threat.
The
Post--Revisionists
see
the
Marshall
Plan
as
an
American
attempt
to
consolidate
the
European
economy.
Who
to
blame?
Why?
--Stalin
was
a
megalomaniac;
Traditionalists
The
USSR
Revisionists
Post--Revisionists
--USSR
was
driven
by
an
expansionist
ideology;
--USSR
was
a
threat
to
Europe.
Both,
but
especially
US
--USSR
was
not
a
real
threat;
--Stalin
was
trying
to
rebuild
the
USSR;
--Roosevelt
did
keep
Soviet
relationship
going;
--Marshall
plan
as
Capitalist
exploitation.
Geopolitical
situation
--Power
vacuum
after
the
Second
World
War;
--Both
acted
with
their
security
at
heart;
--The
Cold
War
is
a
big
misunderstanding.
Containment
policy
The
United
States
tried
various
strategies
to
fight
(the
spread)
of
Communism.
The
most
important
one
is
certainly
the
Containment
policy.
Containment
policy
had
two
forms:
the
offensive
and
defensive
one.
The
offensive
form
comprises
violence,
or
its
threat,
and
the
defensive
one
is
based
on
economic
strategies
to
create
trading
blocs.
The
policy
of
Containment
comprises
various
steps:
--The
Truman
Doctrine:
the
attempt
of
restraining
Communism
through
economic
aid
and
the
declaration
that
the
United
States
will
provide
help
to
those
who
are
free
people
who
try
to
resist
armed
minorities
who
try
to
subjugate
them,
both
from
inside
or
inside
their
country.
This
also
meant
the
attempt
of
preventing
the
spread
of
communism
through
economic
aid.
The
Truman
doctrine
was
announced
on
March
the
12th
of
1947
when
in
Greece
there
was
a
civil
war
between
Royalists
and
Communists.
Russia
on
the
other
hand,
was
insisting
with
Turkey
for
it
to
give
back
Russian
land
conquered
in
1918
by
the
Turkish
people.
In
order
to
persuade
the
US
Congress
to
send
money
to
both
Greece
and
Turkey,
Truman
proclaimed
the
Truman
Doctrine.
It
is
important
to
state
that
this
is
the
first
actual
anti--Communism
strategy,
which
will
be
pursued
in
other
ways
by
Truman
successors.
--The
Marshall
Plan:
was
"announced
by
the
US
Secretary
of
State
George
C.
Marshall
on
5th
June
1947.
Sixteen
European
States
became
the
beneficiaries
of
American
grants.
[$12.5
billion
was
delivered]"
(McLean
and
McMillian
2009,
p.333).
The
Marshall
Plan
was
based
on
the
condition
that
"European
States
traded
with
America"
(Thomas
2009,
p.
35).
The
Marshall
Plan
was
designed
to
comprise
the
Soviet
Union
as
well
as
other
Eastern
European
states.
However,
Stalin
soon
declined
it
and
forced
Eastern
European
States
to
do
so.
The
plan
identifies
the
moment
in
which
compromise
between
the
US
and
the
USSR
was
no
longer
possible.
--Establishment
of
NATO:
which
stands
for
North
Atlantic
Treaty
Organization,
was
established
on
the
4th
of
April
of
1949.
The
NATO
is
essentially
a
military
alliance.
It
constituted
a
group
of
allied
states
which
adopted
the
principle
of
collective
security--
meaning
that
an
attack
towards
any
allied
state
would
have
been
considered
an
assault
towards
them
all.
This
gave
the
right
to
strike
back.
--Creation
of
a
West
German
state:
September
1949:
birth
of
a
Federal
Republic
of
Germany
(West--Germany)
October
1949:
the
portion
of
Germany
which
was
occupied
by
the
Soviets
was
the
German
Democratic
Republic
(East--Germany).
--NSC--68:
completed
in
April
1950,
it
is
the
most
significant
action
which
was
part
of
the
Containment
policy
in
its
offensive
form
is
(National
Security
Council
Report
68
approved
by
Truman).
By
approving
it,
Truman,
allowed
an
immediate
and
large
scale
build
up
in
the
American
military
strength
and
that
of
their
allies.
NCS--68
is
extremely
important
as
it
is
seen
as
America's
determination
to
assert
international
order.
After
that,
national
security
expenditure
rose
from
$13
billion
in
1950
to
$50.4
billion
in
1953.
Soviet
response
While
the
US
was
developing
strategies
to
contain
Communism,
the
Soviet
Union
was
developing
a
scheme
to
defend
itself
against
eventual
Capitalist
attacks.
In
response
to
the
US
NATO,
the
USSR
ideated
the
Warsaw
pact.
The
pact
was
signed
in
Warsaw
on
the
14th
of
May
1955. Like
the
NATO,
the
Warsaw
pact
was
based
on
the
principle
of
mutual
defence.
In
other
words,
if
one
of
the
member
states
was
attacked--
all
the
members
of
the
pact
would
respond
to
the
strike.
Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our The Cold War Notes.