PPE Notes The Philosophy of Science and Social Science Notes
Notes on various texts and debates in the philosophy of science and philosophy of social science, including explanation, relativism, interpretation, and individual/holism....
The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our The Philosophy of Science and Social Science Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:
Steven Lukes - Some Problems about Rationality
Problem: when I come across a set of beliefs which appear prima facie irrational (e.g. in other, ‘primitive’ cultures), what should be my attitude towards them?
are there alternative standards of rationality?
Five possible answers to the problem:
1. ostensible irrationality doesn’t matter, because the beliefs are symbolic
they are a way of describing real human behaviour or relations
religion etc can be taken as real because it is true in its context
we are concerned with relevance of beliefs, not their ultimate validity
so we can dodge the question, because it is nonsensical, irrelevant or misdirected
2. we can apply criteria to modern and primitive beliefs which leave the latter looking quite incomprehensible
we can never know the rationality or irrationality of other cultures because the origins of beliefs etc are untraceable
3. primitive magical/religious beliefs are attempts to explain phenomena, so they can satisfy rationality by virtue of their rational procedures of though/observation
they can, however, be mistaken, and be judged as unsuccessful explanations (when compared to e.g. science)
magic and science have procedure in common - classification of phenomena by the similarities that exist between them
the difference is that the magician characterises the connection between similar phenomena as mystical, whereas it is simply an ideal connection in the magician’s mind (it is subjective and not objective)
both aim at grasping causal connections
science is better in this respect
difference exists between closed and open cultures (shaky ground?)
closed cultures have lack of awareness of alternatives, sacredness of beliefs, and anxiety about threats to them
open cultures do not have these features
so, this answer is characterised by the belief that prima facie irrational beliefs can be rational in method, purpose and form, though unscientific and irrational in content
4. primitive belief systems are coherent (intellectually or logically?), but may fail to accord with reality, may not accord with the rules of logic (Lévy-Bruhl)
Lévi-Bruhl seems to want to suggest that the coherence may be logical - different patterns of thought do not mean different reasoning
does this imply relativism of the rules of logic?
seems to be an uneasy compromise between claiming that primitive (and pre-logical) beliefs are on our standards irrational, but on other standards they are about real phenomena and are logical
5. irrational belief systems in primitive societies should be interpreted as rational according to contextually given criteria of rationality
accounts that judge primitive versus scientific beliefs rest on the false idea that there is an objective reality that one agrees with, and the other doesn’t
what counts as real depends on the context and language used
when a scientist attacks primitive belief systems, he assumes that the primitive societies are attempting to gain a scientific understanding of the world - this is not true, and hence the scientist makes a category mistake
rationality is conformity to norms, so what is rationality will depend on what constitutes conformity and what does not
What is it for a belief - a proposition accepted as true - to be irrational? It may be:
illogical - inconsistent, self contradictory, reliant on invalid inferences
false
nonsensical
though may not be a proposition in this case
situationally specific or ad hoc
held in some deficient respect:
based on irrelevant considerations
based on insufficient evidence
held uncritically
held...
Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our The Philosophy of Science and Social Science Notes.
Notes on various texts and debates in the philosophy of science and philosophy of social science, including explanation, relativism, interpretation, and individual/holism....
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get Started