PPE Notes The Philosophy of Science and Social Science Notes
Notes on various texts and debates in the philosophy of science and philosophy of social science, including explanation, relativism, interpretation, and individual/holism....
The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our The Philosophy of Science and Social Science Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:
Alexander Rosenberg - The Philosophy of Social Science
Chapter Five: Functionalism and Macrosocial Science
Do the social sciences deal with facts about social institutions etc (social facts), or facts about individuals?
if social facts are irreducible, then sociology/social sciences are autonomous
methodological individualism = if there are social facts, they can be reduced to facts about individuals
Holism and human action
How can we establish social facts?
philosophical argument - intentional notions, explanations in terms of beliefs, desires etc presuppose social facts
e.g. cashing a cheque cannot be explained to someone who doesn’t understand the rules that give the exchange its meaning, and these rules only make sense to someone who understands the institutions of persuasion, enforcement etc
we cannot characterise such behaviour without reference to meaning - an account of physical behaviour won’t capture the intentional concepts
hence reference to social facts is unavoidable in individual explanations
methodological individualist - statements referring to social facts can only be tested in observations about individuals
so such statements must be translatable to claims about individuals
but this doesn’t hold because not all theoretical statements in physics can be translated into statements about observations
so rather, the test of statements that transcend observations should be their explanatory power, not testability
in this case, the philosophical argument doesn’t carry much weight, because intentional descriptions (social facts) only describe - they do not explain
holism must show not just that our descriptions of individual actions presuppose social facts, but that our explanations of action presuppose social facts
but if the existence and interactions of individuals are necessary and sufficient for the existence of society and social facts, then social facts should be explicable in terms of facts about individuals (question begging?)
one response for the holist is to claims that the existence/interaction of individuals isn’t sufficient - society is more than the sum of its parts
The autonomy of sociology
Durkheim on the existence of social facts
like cause, like effect - if suicide numbers double over the course of 50 years, but are blamed on the same things (illness, poverty, jealousy) in the same proportions, then these things cannot have been the causes (for why would they have doubled in incidence?)
so the change in rate (a statistical social fact) cannot be explained by psychological facts, but must be explained by other social facts
the behaviour of individuals is determined by unconscious norms of conduct, transmitted by social institutions
we can explain differences in suicide rates in terms of differences in degrees of social integrations (social facts)
this plays into Durkheim’s broader thesis of society as a complex whole, with different institutions functional to different goals
HOLISM
social forces work through individuals
Holism and reductionism in psychology...
Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our The Philosophy of Science and Social Science Notes.
Notes on various texts and debates in the philosophy of science and philosophy of social science, including explanation, relativism, interpretation, and individual/holism....
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get Started