This is an extract of our Book Notes Models Of Executive Politics (Elgie) document, which we sell as part of our Presidential vs Parliamentary Systems Notes collection written by the top tier of University Of Oxford students.
The following is a more accessble plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Presidential vs Parliamentary Systems Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:
Models of Executive Politics: a Framework for the Study of Executive Power Relations in Parliamentary and Semipresidential Regimes
- The study of power relations within the executive branch of government
- Do heads of state, heads of government and government ministers have the power to leave a personal imprint on the decision making process of are they able only to influence policy at the margins?
- Do governments take decisions collegially, or is such policy making impractical?
- Is policy made by elected and accountable representatives or is it made by unelected and irremovable administrators?
- Traditional approach in internal examination and debate of individual countries
- UK: Prime ministerial or cabinet government?
- France: Respective powers of the President and the Prime Minister?
- Germany: Chancellor democracy or co-ordination democracy?
- Criticisms of this approach
- Too narrow, now more acceptable to use wider models including different core executive stakeholders
- Too ethnocentric, in fact has wider implications for other issues in comparative politics
- The distribution of power within the executive branch of government in parliamentary and semi-presidential regimes
- Dunleavy and Rhodes argued that attention should be switched away from a narrow debate about prime ministerial vs collective cabinet power and focused on a 'conceptualization of the central policy machinery in British government, namely, the core executive'
- Core executive: 'All those organizations and structures which primarily serve to pull together and integrate central government policies, or act as final arbiters within the executive of conflicts between different elements of the government machine' (Dunleavy and Rhodes, `Core executive studies in Britain', Public Administration, 68 (1990) p.4)
- Officials in co-ordinating departments such as the Treasury and Foreign Office
- Argued this led to 6 potential models of core executive operations
- Prime Ministerial (2 variants), Cabinet, Ministerial, Segmented Decision Making and Bureaucratic co-ordination
- Can include in argument that a simple notion of Prime Ministerial or Presidential is too simplistic and instead a pluralistic approach should be taken
- Models of Government
- Monocratic Government
- The exercise of personal leadership
Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Presidential vs Parliamentary Systems Notes.