Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


148/78 Ratti

[1979] ECR 1629

Case summary last updated at 13/02/2020 20:48 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case 148/78 Ratti

If the time limit given for the implementation of the directive has not expired, it cannot have direct effect. Directives were directly effective only if the prescribed date, by which the Member State should have implemented it, had passed. Additionally, in instances where the Member State has introduced the required legislation, but has done so defectively, the directive may still be directly effective
ECJ: reasoning of estoppel used: member states were estopped from relying on their failure to implement a directive so as to refuse to recognise the directive in court. Thus the member states could not refuse to recognise directives by failure to implement them.

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best European Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious academic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
European Law Notes

European Law Notes >>