Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


83/91 Meilicke

[1992] ECR I-4871

Case summary last updated at 13/02/2020 20:00 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case 83/91 Meilicke

This dispute concerned a complex dispute about whether a shareholder was entitled to information on the business from the directors. The ECJ held that although the national court was in the best position to judge the facts (and hence whether a reference was necessary) the ECJ itself needed to be fully informed of the facts and relevant national law so that it could judge for itself whether it would be within its jurisdiction by giving an answer. After all, the ECJ would be exceeding the limits of the function entrusted to it if it decided to give a ruling on a hypothetical problem without having before it the matters of fact or law necessary to give a useful answer to the questions submitted to it.

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best European Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious academic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
European Law Notes

European Law Notes >>