Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


Abbott v Abbott

[2008] 124 LQR 209

Case summary last updated at 08/01/2020 15:06 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Abbott v Abbott

H and W got married and H was given some land by his mother in his sole name. H and W took out a joint loan with joint liability for the building of a home. H and W’s earnings went into a joint account and paid off the mortgage jointly. Privy Council held that the presumption of sole ownership was rebutted by the parties’ course of conduct relating to the property. When a parent gives a present for the purposes of building a matrimonial home it is for the benefit of both parties and the fact that the parties did all their financial dealing together implies an agreement to share ownership. Thus each party would be given a 50% share. This was reasoned on the basis of Stack v Dowden, the speech of Lord Bridge in Rosset now being overturned in law. 

Abbott v Abbott crops up in following areas of law