AEG-Telefunken v Commission Case [1983] ECR. 3151
By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 07:12
Reviewed ByOxbridge Law Team
Judgement for the case AEG-Telefunken v Commission Case
Table Of Contents
AEG operates system of distribution throughout the EU, to be part of it, needed to accept charging the high prices.
One company didn't and complained this was concerted practice.
AEG thought would win easy because unilateral behavior
Held
The tacit agreement of all other distributors made it a concerted practice. .
Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch
For Further Study on AEG-Telefunken v Commission Case
389 total pages
392 purchased
Competition Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Camb...
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedSimilar Cases
Related Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
| Competition Law | Article 101 Notes (22 pages) |
| Competition Law | Article 101 Tfeu Notes (24 pages) |
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
389 total pages
392 purchased
Competition Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Camb...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.