This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Albany Home Loans v Massey [1997] 2 All ER 609

By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 07:02

Judgement for the case Albany Home Loans v Massey

Table Of Contents

  • Plaintiff was in arrears to the mortgagee, Defendant, and sought to defend possession on the grounds that he had been unfairly dismissed by one of Plaintiff’s associate companies, X, would win money in excess of what he owed to Defendant, and therefore the repossession ought to be stayed.

CA

  • Rejected Defendant’s argument.

    • A counter-claim does not prevent their being a claim for repossession, and the power to stay proceedings under s.36 AJA 1970 did not apply because repayment would not have been possible within a reasonable period (the unfair dismissal claim was not due for another 2 years at the time of the first instance trial).

    • Also, where it is of no benefit to the mortgagee to allow possession claims against one but not both parties, it is wrong to order that only one of the possessing parties leave. 

Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch

For Further Study on Albany Home Loans v Massey

Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.

Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️

Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.

Get Started

Related Product Samples

These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.

Claim every advantage to get a first in law
Land Law Notes
987 total pages
1284 purchased

Land Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. ...