Parochial church council served a notice on Defendants to repair the chancel of the parish church.
Defendants resisted payment, alleging, inter alia, that the notice infringed its rights under Article 1 of the First Protocol.
HL concluded that PCC couldn’t be regarded as falling in either the PA or hybrid category. Although CofE had special links with central government & performed certain public functions, it was a religious not a governmental organisation & PCCs were part of the means by which the Church promoted its religious mission & discharged financial responsibilities in respect of parish churches.
The functions of PCCs were primarily concerned with pastoral & admin matters within the parish & were not wholly of a public nature / were not core public authorities under s.6(1).
When Plaintiff took steps to enforce Defendant’s liability for the repair of the chancel, it was not performing a function of public nature, which would have rendered it a hybrid public authority.
Administrative Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and C...
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedThese product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
Administrative Law | Jr Procedure Notes (58 pages) |
Tort Law | Jr Procedure Notes (58 pages) |
Administrative Law | Procedural Exclusivity Notes (18 pages) |