Richard Crossman kept a diary detailing cabinet discussions, etc. from 1964-66 and after his death, 10 years later, the Sunday Times wanted to publish them.
The AG sought an order to “restrain” publication.
The QBD asserted that it had the power, under the doctrine of confidence, to restrain publication and would do so where collective responsibility doctrine was threatened (since it was in public interest).
Since this was 10 years on, the court did not believe publication would harm collective responsibility and would not harm free cabinet discussion now.
Accepted that generally collective responsibility establishes confidence and that it would be against the public interest that this confidential info be made public.
However 10 ears is sufficient time for it to pass into history.
IP law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. Th...
Labour Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge...
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedThese product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.