This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Baigent and Leigh v The Random House Group Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 247

By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 07:13

Judgement for the case Baigent and Leigh v The Random House Group Ltd

Table Of Contents

  • Claimant published a non-fiction book, “The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail” based on proposition that Jesus’ bloodline had survived.

  • Defendant wrote the fictional thriller “The Da Vinci Code” based on same main idea.

  • Defendant had access to Claimant’s book when writing Da Vinci Code, and Claimant claimed for breach on grounds Claimant had copied 15 Central Theme elements.

Held

  • Parts allegedly copied by Defendant were not protected by the literary work copyright subsisting in HBHG

    • Parts allegedly copied were merely general propositions at too high a level of abstraction to attract copyright, thus fell on wrong side of ideas/expression divide

  • In addition, what Defendant had taken from Claimant’s work was not sufficiently substantial to qualify for copyright protection

    • The Central Theme was not a substantial part of HBHG

    • Was simply a selection of similar features compiled in order to give impression of copying

Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch

For Further Study on Baigent and Leigh v The Random House Group Ltd

Intellectual Property Law Notes
1,014 total pages
1033 purchased

IP law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. Th...

Intellectual Property Law Notes
446 total pages
22 purchased

My notes cover all the main cases in intellectual property law. They a...

Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.

Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️

Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.

Get Started
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
Intellectual Property Law Notes
446 total pages
22 purchased

My notes cover all the main cases in intellectual property law. They a...