Oxbridge Notes uses cookies for login, tax evidence, digital piracy prevention, business intelligence, and advertising purposes, as explained in our privacy policy.

Technical settings

Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

Beard v London General Omnibus Co

[1900] 2 QB 530

Case summary last updated at 20/01/2020 17:31 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Beard v London General Omnibus Co

X, a bus conductor, decided to turn D’s bus around so that it was facing the right direction for the next journey, in the absence of the driver, and negligently hit P, who sued D. CA dismissed P’s claim since X had not been authorised to drive the bus and the negligence did not therefore occur within the scope of X’s employment. 
 
Smith LJ: Normally there is a presumption that the person operating the thing is authorised to do so, but this presumption is negatived here since it was the conductor, not the driver, who was driving. 

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Tort Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious adademic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Tort Law Notes

Tort Law Notes >>