This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Begum v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council [2003] UKHL 5

By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 07:01

Judgement for the case Begum v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council

Table Of Contents

  • Defendant accepted that Plaintiff was homeless and that it had a duty to make her a reasonable offer of accommodation. It offered her a flat, which she contended was unsuitable since the area was characterised by racism and she said that she had been attacked shortly after visiting the flat.

  • LA did an internal review and said that it was suitable accommodation.

  • HL said that clearly the LA council officers were not an independent tribunal for the purposes of ECHR. However such a decision might properly be made by a tribunal which did not itself possess the necessary independence to satisfy the requirements of Article 6(1) so long as measures were in place to safeguard the fairness of the proceedings and the decision was subject to ultimate judicial control by a court.

  • Because of how detailed this particular statutory scheme was and the fact that it was subject to judicial review rendered it sufficiently fair to come within Article 6. 

Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch

For Further Study on Begum v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council

Administrative Law Notes
1,167 total pages
443 purchased

Administrative Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and C...

Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.

Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️

Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.

Get Started
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
Administrative Law Notes
1,167 total pages
443 purchased

Administrative Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and C...