Bernstein v Skyviews [1978] QB 479
Judgement for the case Bernstein v Skyviews
Table Of Contents
Defendant flew over Plaintiff’s house to take photos of it and Defendant claimed trespass and invasion of privacy.
The court denied this, saying that an owner's rights in the airspace above his land were restricted to such height as was necessary for the ordinary use and enjoyment of the land and structures upon it, and above that height he had no greater rights than any other member of the public.
Griffiths J
Reached this decision on the basis of balancing the interests of private individuals with the public at large to use spaces.
For Further Study on Bernstein v Skyviews
In depth revision notes that include lecturer and academic commentary a...
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedSimilar Cases
Related Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
| Property Law | Property I Physical Limits Of Land Notes (8 pages) |
Tort Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. ...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.