Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

Blum v DPP

[2006] EWHC 3209

Case summary last updated at 06/02/2020 12:06 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Blum v DPP

Some people were convicted of taking part in an unauthorised protest. They accepted that the requirement for authorisation was not incompatible with ECHR article 11 but said that the conduct of the protest, once it began, should be considered. Divisional court said authorities on reasonableness of ending protests were concerned with authorised protests and, given that the appellants accept the lawfulness of s.132 (above) and its convention compliance, the police were entitled to arrest the appellants and end the protest.

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Constitutional Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious adademic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Constitutional Law Notes

Constitutional Law Notes >>