Judgement for the case Blum v DPP
Table Of Contents
Some people were convicted of taking part in an unauthorised protest.
They accepted that the requirement for authorisation was not incompatible with ECHR article 11 but said that the conduct of the protest, once it began, should be considered.
Divisional court said authorities on reasonableness of ending protests were concerned with authorised protests and, given that the appellants accept the lawfulness of s.132 (above) and its convention compliance, the police were entitled to arrest the appellants and end the protest.
For Further Study on Blum v DPP
Constitutional Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and C...
A collection of the best BCL notes the director of Oxbridge Notes (an O...
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions š Get answers š It's simple šļøššļø
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedSimilar Cases
Related Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
Constitutional Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and C...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.