Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


Boustany v Pigott

[1995] 69 P & CR 298

Case summary last updated at 04/01/2020 19:28 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Boustany v Pigott

P leased a property to D, whose affairs were managed by her brother, X, since she was “quite slow”. When X was away, P got a lawyer to draw up a new lease at a much higher rent and although the lawyer warned D that it would not be in her interest to sign, she insisted on doing so. D wanted to set aside the new lease as an unconscionable bargain and PC allowed this. 

Lord Templeman: There are several points regarding when and how equitable fraud can vitiate a contract: (1) For equity to be invoked the agreement must be unconscionable in that “one of the parties to it has imposed the objectionable terms in a morally reprehensible manner”; (2) “Unconscionable” relates to to the terms of the bargain AND to the moral culpability of the stronger party; (3) There has to be both unequal bargaining power and an abuse of that power; (4) There has to actually be unconscionable conduct  and it isn’t enough that the terms are unfair or imbalanced; (5) The burden is on the party seeking relief to show unconscionable conduct, “namely that unconscientious advantage has been taken of his disabling condition or circumstances”. Mckendrick: It is odd that the bargain was set aside despite P getting good legal advice not to sign from the lawyer. 

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Contract Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious academic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Contract Law Notes

Contract Law Notes >>