This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Breckland Group Holdings v London & Suffolk Properties Ltd [1989] BCLC 100

By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 06:58

Judgement for the case Breckland Group Holdings v London & Suffolk Properties Ltd

Table Of Contents

  • Articles of company stated that management of company resided with directors. In addition, shareholders had shareholders’ agreement stating that litigation could only be brought on behalf of company with consent of directors.

  • Majority shareholder (Defendant) launched action on behalf of company, other shareholder (Claimant) sought to have action restrained.


  • Principle in Quin & Axtens applies

    • I.e. if decision is one for board to properly make, is not for shareholders to take it themselves

  • This conclusion is backed up by shareholders’ agreement

    • I.e. agreement indicates shareholders thought decision was properly one for the board to make

  • Thus as power to litigate was vested in board alone (and not the shareholders), was not one with which general meeting could intervene.

  • Thus litigation restrained.

Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch

For Further Study on Breckland Group Holdings v London & Suffolk Properties Ltd

Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.

Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️

Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.

Get Started

Related Product Samples

These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.

Claim every advantage to get a first in law
Company Law Notes
805 total pages
1082 purchased

Company law notes fully updated for recent exams in the UK. These notes...