Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


C-233/94 Germany v Parliament (Deposit guarantee directive)

[1997] ECR I-2405

Case summary last updated at 11/02/2020 20:17 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case C-233/94 Germany v Parliament (Deposit guarantee directive)

EP and Council had introduced a deposit-backing scheme, to protect deposit holders, as they were required to do by article 57 of the treaty. Germany argued that they failed to explain in the directive how the subsidiarity principle was not being infringed, as they were obliged to do under art. 190 EC treaty. ECJ did not accept this challenge, holding that there was adequate explanation. 
ECJ: The explanation given was that it is important for assets to backed throughout the internal market, as the consequence of deposits becoming unavailable, and ensuing financial panic, could easily spread across borders. Therefore it was insufficient that member states develop their own rules about capital reserves. Good- makes economic sense

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best European Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious academic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
European Law Notes

European Law Notes >>