This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

C-249/96 Grant v South West Trains [1998] ECR I-621

By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 07/01/2024 05:42

Judgement for the case C-249/96 Grant v South West Trains

Table Of Contents

  • Plaintiff’s employer offered concession rates for train journeys for employees’ spouses or long term partners. However it refused to give these concessions to Plaintiff’s same-sex long term partner.

  • ECJ held that clearly it couldn’t infringe directive 76/207, since that concerned equal treatment of men and women, and not sexual orientation. Same was true of article 141 of EC Treaty.

    • The law did not at that time view stable marriages between same-sex couples as equivalent to marriages between heterosexual couples. 

ECJ

  • Although respect for the fundamental rights which form an integral part of the general principles of Community law is a condition of the legality of Community acts, those rights cannot in themselves have the effect of extending the scope of the Treaty provisions beyond the competences of the Community.

  • It rejected the conceptualisation of ‘sex’ as including ‘sexual orientation’ as is considered to be the case in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. 

Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch

For Further Study on C-249/96 Grant v South West Trains

Labour Law Notes
1,003 total pages
273 purchased

Labour Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge...

Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.

Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️

Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.

Get Started
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
European Law Notes
1,161 total pages
1033 purchased

European Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...