C-408/95 Eurotunnel SA v Seafrance [1997] ECR I-6315
By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 07/01/2024 04:50
Reviewed ByOxbridge Law Team
Judgement for the case C-408/95 Eurotunnel SA v Seafrance
Table Of Contents
The ECJ held that a challenge under Article 234 was possible regarding provisions of a directive addressed to member states if it was unclear that the applicants would have been granted standing under 230.
TWD case was distinguished because there it was obvious that the plaintiff would have had standing to bring an annulment claim under 230.
RELATED CASES
Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch
For Further Study on C-408/95 Eurotunnel SA v Seafrance
1,161 total pages
1033 purchased
European Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedSimilar Cases
Related Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
| European Law | Preliminary Reference Notes (18 pages) |
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
1,161 total pages
1033 purchased
European Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.