Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


C-84/94 UK v EU Council

[1998] IRLR 30

Case summary last updated at 19/02/2020 20:28 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case C-84/94 UK v EU Council

 The UK was challenging the validity of the Working Time Directive on the basis of lack of competence (saying it shouldn’t be based on article 138-concerned with health and safety of workers), and should have been enacted under art. 308 (requiring unanimity), and saying that it was disproportionate. ECJ disagreed on all these points, except repealing a directive provision designating Sunday as the principal rest day, as that had nothing to do with health and safety of workers. 
ECJ: V. broad definition of health: “a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being that does not consist only in the absence of illness or infirmity.” Social wellbeing seems to stretch the definition too far- health does not equal welfare.

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Labour Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious academic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Labour Law Notes

Labour Law Notes >>