This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Carmichael v National Power [1999] ICR 1226

By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 07/01/2024 18:01

Judgement for the case Carmichael v National Power

Table Of Contents

  • Plaintiffs worked as tour guides under a zero hours arrangement. They were paid only for the hours they worked, and tax and national insurance contributions were deducted, and their contracts described them as ‘casual’ workers.

  • HL said they were not employees (and hence couldn’t require terms of contract under s.1 ERA 1996) because there wasn’t sufficient mutuality of obligation. 

Lord Irvine

  • To find a contract of service there had to be an ‘irreducible minimum of mutuality of obligation necessary to create a contract of service’ which wasn’t present here:

    • The documents contained no provisions governing when, how, or with what frequency guide work would be offered;

    • There were no provisions for notice of termination on either side;

    • The sickness, holiday and pension arrangements for regular staff did not apply;

    • Nor did the grievance and disciplinary procedures.

Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch

For Further Study on Carmichael v National Power

Labour Law Notes
1,003 total pages
273 purchased

Labour Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge...

Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.

Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️

Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.

Get Started
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
Labour Law Notes
1,003 total pages
273 purchased

Labour Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge...