This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Case C-176/03 Commission v Council [2005] ECR I-7879

By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 07:15

Judgement for the case Case C-176/03 Commission v Council

Table Of Contents

  • The Community enacted a Framework Decision under the Third Pillar, Title VI TEU, requiring states to impose criminal sanctions for certain environmental offenses.

  • Commission argued that since the measure was dealing with environmental protection, it came within the competence of the first pillar of the European Union (i.e. the EC) and ought to have been enacted under art.175.

  • The ECJ accepted this and annulled the measure. 

ECJ

  • Said, court accepted that in general neither criminal law nor procedure came within 1st pillar, but said that this did not prevent the Community legislature from taking measures to impose criminal sanctions where needed to prevent environmental offences.

    • This is important as it prevents the emasculation of the EC Treaty by the more intergovernmental approach found in pillars 2 and 3. 

Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch

For Further Study on Case C-176/03 Commission v Council

Environmental Law Notes
262 total pages
50 purchased

A collection of the best Environmental Law notes the director of Oxbrid...

Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.

Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️

Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.

Get Started
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
European Law Notes
1,161 total pages
1033 purchased

European Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...