Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


Case C-176/03 Commission v Council

[2005] ECR I-7879

Case summary last updated at 11/02/2020 19:51 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Case C-176/03 Commission v Council

 The Council enacted a Framework Decision under the Third Pillar, Title VI TEU, requiring states to impose criminal sanctions for certain environmental offenses. Commission argued that since the measure was dealing with environmental protection, it came within the competence of the first pillar of the European Union (i.e. the EC) and ought to have been enacted under art.175. The ECJ accepted this and annulled the measure. 
ECJ said: Court accepted that in general neither criminal law nor procedure came within 1st pillar, but said that this did not prevent the Community legislature from taking measures to impose criminal sanctions where needed to prevent environmental offences. This is important as it prevents the emasculation of the EC Treaty by the more intergovernmental approach found in pillars 2 and 3. 

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best European Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious academic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
European Law Notes

European Law Notes >>