This was a dispute concerning whether Community law could prevent the operation of res judicata (under Italian law).
ECJ ruled that it could and did in this case.
In the absence of Community legislation in this area, the rules implementing the principle of res judicata are a matter for the national legal order, in accordance with the principle of the procedural autonomy of the Member States
subject to equivalence and effectiveness principles. Lucchini didn’t change this.
The res judicata rule was a procedural domestic rule that governed remedies in a national context for breach of community law.
In this specific case it went against effectiveness because of tax considerations, etc.
However, it is not the general rule that res judicata doesn’t apply regarding community law (as some might interpret Lucchini as saying)
European Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedThese product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.