This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Case C-372/04 ex parte Watts [2006] ECR I-4325

By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 07:15

Judgement for the case Case C-372/04 ex parte Watts

Table Of Contents

  • Watts needed a hip replacement and the NHS didn’t give her one for a year, so she went to France and got the treatment after her condition deteriorated.

  • She asked the NHS to reimburse her costs, but it refused on the grounds that she had failed to obtain prior authorisation.

  • ECJ held that the rule on prior authorisation infringed the Article 49 freedom to provide services and that the NHS would have to compensate an individual who went overseas after a medically unacceptable delay. 

ECJ

  • Watts paid for the services she received and the fact that she sought reimbursement does not mean that it ceases to become a service or that Article 49 no longer applies. 

----

Free movement and fundamental rights: how we seek to reconcile differently motivated fundamental – but not absolute – rights.

Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch

For Further Study on Case C-372/04 ex parte Watts

European Law Notes
1,161 total pages
1033 purchased

European Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...

Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.

Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️

Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.

Get Started
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
European Law Notes
1,161 total pages
1033 purchased

European Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...