This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Case C-459/99 Mouvement contre le racisme, etc (MRAX) v Etat Belge [2002] ECR I–6591

By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 07:15

Judgement for the case Case C-459/99 Mouvement contre le racisme, etc (MRAX) v Etat Belge

Table Of Contents

  • This case concerned a procedure for publication of banns (official announcements) of marriage and the documents which must be produced in order to obtain a visa for the purpose of contracting a marriage in the Kingdom of Belgium or to obtain a visa for the purpose of reuniting a family on the basis of a marriage contracted abroad.

  • ECJ said that a MS could not refuse entry or send back a spouse of a non-EU citizen even if he doesn’t have the required entry documents (passport, visa, etc.), provided he is able to prove his identity and his conjugal ties, procedure for publication of banns of marriage and the documents which must be produced in order to obtain a visa for the purpose of contracting a marriage in the Kingdom of Belgium or to obtain a visa for the purpose of reuniting a family on the basis of a marriage contracted abroad.

    • (This is based on a construction of Article 3 of Directive 68/360, Article 3 of Directive 73/148 and Regulation No 2317/95, read in the light of the principle of proportionality).

  • The Court also found that a member state could not refuse to issue a residence permit to a third-country national married to a national of a member state who entered the territory of that member state lawfully, nor issue an order expelling them from the territory, on the sole ground that their visa expired before they applied for a residence permit.

    • NB how Article 5 of 2004/38 now supports this conclusion. 

ECJ

In view of the importance which the Community legislature has attached to the protection of family life (see paragraph 53 of this judgment), it is in any event disproportionate and, therefore, prohibited to send back a third country national married to a national of a Member State where he is able to prove his identity and the conjugal ties and there is no evidence to establish that he represents a risk to the requirements of public policy, public security or public health.

Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch

For Further Study on Case C-459/99 Mouvement contre le racisme, etc (MRAX) v Etat Belge

European Law Notes
1,161 total pages
1027 purchased

European Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...

Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.

Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️

Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.

Get Started
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
European Law Notes
1,161 total pages
1027 purchased

European Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...