This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Clarks of Hove v Bakers Union [1978] ICR 1076

By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 07/01/2024 07:12

Judgement for the case Clarks of Hove v Bakers Union

Table Of Contents

  • Defendant was in financial difficulty and it became clear, once a potential investor withdrew interest, that the company would have to close.

  • Therefore all employees were dismissed by notice and the Defendant tried to argue that it wasn’t in breach of (forerunner to) Article 188 because the case fell within the exception under Article 188(7) of ‘special reasons’ for noncompliance.

  • CA held that the circumstances were not special and thus Defendant was in breach of 188. 

Lane LJ

  • Approach is to ask:

    1. Were there special circumstances that

    2. Rendered compliance with s.188 not reasonably impractical, and if so

    3. Did the employers take all such steps as were reasonably practicable.

  • For (1) to be fulfilled there have to be circumstances special and specific to the offence, not to the offender.

    • Insolvency on its own is not a special circumstance - it depends on the cause of the insolvency, e.g. a sudden disaster might be unique, whereas a gradual running down would not. 

Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch

For Further Study on Clarks of Hove v Bakers Union

Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.

Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️

Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.

Get Started

Related Product Samples

These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.

Claim every advantage to get a first in law
Labour Law Notes
1,003 total pages
273 purchased

Labour Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge...