Oxbridge Notes uses cookies for login, tax evidence, digital piracy prevention, business intelligence, and advertising purposes, as explained in our privacy policy.

Technical settings

Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

CRAM and Rheinzink v Commission

[1984] ECr 1679

Case summary last updated at 24/01/2020 16:59 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case CRAM and Rheinzink v Commission

 Two companies, French and German. Supplied zinc products to a belgian company. Under terms of contract Belgian company could only use products for export, not resell products in common market. What happened: Belgian company started selling products in Germany, undercutting prices of German company. At that moment, both suppliers, German and French stopped delivering supplies. Court: there was perfectly rational reason of parallel behaviour.

Held: If rational explanation for parallel behavior, then it's okay. 

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Competition Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious adademic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Competition Law Notes

Competition Law Notes >>