Plaintiff sought judicial review because he was charged with an offence whose content contravened the presumption of innocence contained in art. 6(1) ECHR and he had a legitimate expectation that he would not be charged with an offence that infringed his ECHR rights.
However HL held that he could have no legitimate expectation here since the wording of the charge was clear and unambiguously denied the presumption of innocence.Β
He would be βvery hesitant to hold that a legitimate expectation could be founded on answers given in Parliament to often very general questions"
Administrative Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and C...
Ask questions π Get answers π It's simple ποΈπποΈ
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedThese product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
Criminal Justice, Security, & Human Rights | Fair Trial Rights And Secret Evidence Notes (117 pages) |
Administrative Law | Procedural Fairness Reasons And Expectations Notes (31 pages) |