Articles stated that Claimant was to be the solicitor of Positive Life. However he was not appointed so sued for breach of the articles.
At time articles were created, Claimant was not a member. However by time Claimant brought action, Claimant was a member.
Claimant could not enforce the articles.
This because outsiders to company cannot enforce rights purportedly granted to them under articles.
Articles only have legal effect as between members.
NB court did not look at all at whether fact that Claimant had subsequently become a member meant he had right to enforce articles…
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedThese product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
Company law | Company Constitution Notes (12 pages) |
Company law | Corporate Constitution Notes (7 pages) |