ER Ives v High [1967] 2 QB 379
Judgement for the case ER Ives v High
Table Of Contents
W allowed H access to his back garden & to build a garage there, in return for which H didn’t complain when W’s foundations encroached on H’s land.
However no deed was executed/land charge registered.
Winn LJ (alone) approached the issue on the basis that W’s representations to H, coupled with H’s detriment from incurring expenses in building the garage etc. amounted to proprietary estoppel, the equity arising from which would enable the court to grant an easement.
For Further Study on ER Ives v High
Land Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. ...
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedSimilar Cases
Related Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
| Land Law | Easements Notes (48 pages) |
| Land Law | Licences And Proprietary Estoppel Notes (13 pages) |
Land Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. ...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.