This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Falconer v ASLEF [1986] IRLR 331

By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 07/01/2024 06:00

Judgement for the case Falconer v ASLEF

Table Of Contents

  • Plaintiff, a passenger, had bought a rail ticket which he was prevented from using because of industrial action.

  • He sued the union for expenses incurred as a result (statutory protections didn’t apply since the unions were striking without a ballot).

Henham J

  • Held that Defendant's knew of the existence of contracts between British Rail and passengers who had already purchased tickets at the time the strike was called, and they intended to interfere with the performance of such contracts by inducing British Rail employees to withdraw their labour.

  • The interference with the performance of the contract between Plaintiff and British Rail was a necessary consequence of the Defendant's actions and therefore they were liable to him for damages.

Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch

For Further Study on Falconer v ASLEF

Labour Law Notes
1,003 total pages
273 purchased

Labour Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge...

Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.

Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️

Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.

Get Started

Related Product Samples

These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.

Labour LawIndustrial Action Notes (19 pages)
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
Labour Law Notes
1,003 total pages
273 purchased

Labour Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge...