Fisher v Bell [1961] 1 QB 394
By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 06:59
Reviewed ByOxbridge Law Team
Judgement for the case Fisher v Bell
Table Of Contents
Defendant advertised an illegal flick-knife in his shop window but couldn’t be sued for an “offer to sell” an offensive weapon contrary to a statute, because it was merely an invitation to treat.
Lord Parker
Conceded that this seemed absurd but said that it was a problem for parliament to correct.
RELATED CASES
Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch
For Further Study on Fisher v Bell
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedSimilar Cases
Related Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
1,511 total pages
749 purchased
Contract law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.