This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Gibson v Manchester CC [1979] 1 WLR 294

By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 06:59

Judgement for the case Gibson v Manchester CC

  • Plaintiff wanted to buy his council house and sent off the application form. The council sent him a form stating the price at which the council “may be prepared” to sell the house and a letter which explicitly stated that it was not to be regarded as an offer/binding.

  • The letter invited Plaintiff to “make a formal application.”

  • Following negotiations over the price/repairs to the house, the council put the house onto a list of properties that could be sold, but, following elections, decided not to make the sale.

  • HL held that no contract existed: The letter was explicitly not an offer and the naming of a price was one that “may” be accepted i.e. not an offer. These were really invitations to treat, while moving the property onto the “sell” list was merely a signal of interest.

  • Furthermore the request that he make a “formal application”, NOT “accept the offer” shows that there was no valid offer. 

In CA Denning MR

  • Rejected the “acceptance and offer” approach and argued for an approach that looked at overall conduct, correspondence etc to see if there was an agreement to make the material terms binding (see above in CW).

  • This was overruled by HL. 

Lord Denning

  • (NB his views are dismissed later on by HL in this case)

  • It is impossible to reduce all types of contract down to plain offer and acceptance (as would make the reasoning so detailed and complex in this case - see HL verdict on it).

  • He says:

You should look at the correspondence as a whole and at the conduct of the parties and see therefrom whether the parties have come to an agreement on everything that was material. If by their correspondence and their conduct you can see an agreement on all material terms — which was intended thenceforward to be binding — then there is a binding contract in law even though all the formalities have not been gone through.

  • NOTE: This is a less formalistic approach and is better suited to cope with variety of ways that contract can be formed. 

Lord Diplock

  • There are some types of contract which don’t easily fit into the conventional mirror-image approach, but this case does (it is easy to look at the documents and see whether there has been an offer and acceptance). 

Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch

For Further Study on Gibson v Manchester CC

Contract Law Notes
1,511 total pages
744 purchased

Contract law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...

Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.

Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️

Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.

Get Started
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
Contract Law Notes
1,511 total pages
744 purchased

Contract law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...