Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


R v Goldman

[2001] Crim LR 822

Case summary last updated at 11/01/2020 14:34 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case R v Goldman

 D asked a porn film company to make him a video involving children. CA upheld his conviction for inciting the company to create illegal child pornography, saying that incitement meant persuasion, encouragement or inducement. In this case D had sent the company a cheque to make the video 

R v Goldman crops up in following areas of law