R v Goldman [2001] Crim LR 822
By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 07:02
Reviewed ByOxbridge Law Team
Judgement for the case R v Goldman
Table Of Contents
Defendant asked a porn film company to make him a video involving children.
CA upheld his conviction for inciting the company to create illegal child pornography, saying that incitement meant persuasion, encouragement or inducement.
In this case Defendant had sent the company a cheque to make the video.
Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch
For Further Study on R v Goldman
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions š Get answers š It's simple šļøššļø
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedRelated Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
1,072 total pages
662 purchased
Criminal Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambrid...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.