This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Gorringe v Calderdale MBC [2004] UKHL 15

By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 07:04

Judgement for the case Gorringe v Calderdale MBC

Table Of Contents

  • Plaintiff was in a car accident at a dangerous point in the road and sued R for negligence saying that it (the highway authority) should have painted a “slow” sign in the road so as to prevent accidents.

  • HL said there was no duty of care since the statutory duty to “maintain the highway” did not give rise to a duty of care or private enforcement. 

Lord Hoffmann

  • To infer a private duty of care from a statutory duty the public authority must have ‘assumed responsibility’ for the subject in question and there must be universal reliance.

Lord Hutton

  • To infer a private duty from a public one, it is necessary to look at parliament’s intent and whether the statute affords protection to a limited or limitless class of people. 

Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch

For Further Study on Gorringe v Calderdale MBC

Personal Injury and Clinical Negligence Notes
63 total pages
105 purchased

A collection of the best LPC Personal Injury and Clinical Negligence no...

Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.

Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️

Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.

Get Started
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
Tort Law Notes
1,070 total pages
845 purchased

Tort Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. ...