This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Greatorex v Greatorex [2000] 4 All ER 769

By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 07:04

Judgement for the case Greatorex v Greatorex

Table Of Contents

  • Defendant caused a car crash and Plaintiff, his father, was one of the firemen called to get Defendant out of the car, as a result of which Plaintiff suffered a Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and sued Defendant for negligently causing him the illness.

  • CA held that a person does not owe a duty of care to a 3rd party who might suffer psychiatric illness from seeing the self-inflicted injuries. 

CA

  • To impose such a duty would be to limit individual freedom too far (and deter people from using the emergency services, even in an emergency where they have severe injuries).

  • It would also make litigation within the family very common (e.g. I am fixing the roof and negligently fall off - law shouldn’t disrupt the accidents which are part of family life), which is undesirable.

Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch

For Further Study on Greatorex v Greatorex

Tort Law Notes
1,070 total pages
845 purchased

Tort Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. ...

Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.

Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️

Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.

Get Started
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
Tort Law Notes
1,070 total pages
845 purchased

Tort Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. ...