This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Griggs v Duke Power Co [1971] 401 US 424

By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 07/01/2024 05:24

Judgement for the case Griggs v Duke Power Co

Case before US Supreme court

  • Defendant used to segregate its black employees, only allowing them to work in the Labour Department (lowest paying dept).

  • To try and comply with new Civil Rights Act it said that to work outside the labour dept it was necessary to pass an IQ test and have a high school diploma.

    • This effectively stopped black workers from getting jobs outside the labour dept.

  • Supreme Court held that this practice was unlawful and discriminatory.

  • The Court found that under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, if such tests disparately impact ethnic minority groups, businesses must demonstrate that such tests are "reasonably related" to the job for which the test is required.

  • The tests must be a ‘reasonable measure of job performance’, which these tests were not. 

Chief Justice Burger

  • The aim of the act was the removal of arbitrary or artificial barriers to work.

Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch

For Further Study on Griggs v Duke Power Co

Labour Law Notes
1,003 total pages
273 purchased

Labour Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge...

Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.

Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️

Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.

Get Started
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
Labour Law Notes
1,003 total pages
273 purchased

Labour Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge...