Oxbridge Notes uses cookies for login, tax evidence, digital piracy prevention, business intelligence, and advertising purposes, as explained in our privacy policy.

Technical settings

Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

Grigsby v Melville

[1973] 1 All ER 385

Case summary last updated at 08/01/2020 16:00 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Grigsby v Melville

D was granted a cottage with a right that purported to be an easement allowing him to use P’s cellar for storage. P sought an injunction to stop D entering her land and using her cellar. The court held that D’s claim of easement of storage amounted virtually to an exclusive right of user so extensive as to be incapable of constituting an easement in law. 
 
Brightman J: Copeland established that a claim amounting to an exclusive right of user was too extensive to be covered by easement. 

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Administrative Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious adademic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Administrative Law Notes

Administrative Law Notes >>