Defendant’s negligence led to Claimant’s children being kidnapped by their father and being taken to Tunisia.
The court held that although the protection of the children was not the sole object of the contract with Claimant, it was a “significant reason” for Claimant’s entering the contract.
I.e. upholding Lord Steyn’s view in Farley.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedThese product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.