X was appointed managing director of a company; under terms of appointment was stated that X would carry exercise the powers of the company as would be from time to time vested in him by board of directors.
Board decided to make X concentrate exclusively on a subsidiary company; X stated that this was repudiation of contract of employment as it was inconsistent with his role as managing director.
Terms of appointment made it clear that X, as managing director, only had so much power as board might vest in him.
Thus boardβs later decision was not breach of this agreement.Β
Ask questions π Get answers π It's simple ποΈπποΈ
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedThese product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
Company law | Corporate Governance Notes (18 pages) |