Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


Hartog v Colin & Shields

[1939] 3 All ER 566

Case summary last updated at 02/01/2020 16:35 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Hartog v Colin & Shields

D mistakenly offered to sell P objects at a price per pound per pound when they had meant to offer them at a price per piece and P tried to enforce the mistakenly made offer. Singleton J held that since P must have known that the price was mistaken, he could not insist on the offer. 

Singleton J: A party cannot accept and seek to take advantage from an offer which he must have known to be mistaken i.e. a “snapping up” case. The mistake must be “material”. 

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Contract Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious academic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Contract Law Notes

Contract Law Notes >>