Haywood v Brunswick Permanent Building Society [1881] 8 QBD 403
By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 07:01
Reviewed ByOxbridge Law Team
Judgement for the case Haywood v Brunswick Permanent Building Society
Table Of Contents
Defendant undertook to keep land rented to him by Plaintiff in good repair and to rebuild elements where necessary. CA held that Tulk did not apply to positive covenants.
Brett LJ
To extend Tulk to non restrictive covenants would be to create a new equity.
RELATED CASES
Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch
For Further Study on Haywood v Brunswick Permanent Building Society
987 total pages
1289 purchased
Land Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. ...
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedSimilar Cases
Related Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
| Land Law | Leases Notes (77 pages) |
| Land Law | Restrictive Covenants Notes (38 pages) |
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
987 total pages
1289 purchased
Land Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. ...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.