Hill v Tupper [1863] 2 H & C 121
Judgement for the case Hill v Tupper
Table Of Contents
Plaintiff owned an allotment of land on the side of a river ran his boat on the river which he was allowed to do by the council for his business.
-
Court held that this was a licence and could not be an easement because the river was not used for “accommodating” the claimant’s land in the sense of helping to “facilitate a working of the very soil of the land”.
Gardner: This demonstrates that the test is too narrow.
For Further Study on Hill v Tupper
Land Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. ...
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedRelated Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
| Land Law | Easements Notes (11 pages) |
| Land Law | Easements Notes (48 pages) |
Land Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. ...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.